 
          
        
      
    
    
    
     
    
  
	
			
			Philip
			GUSTON
		
	
	
	
	
	Canada 
	
	
		1913 
		
	
	
	 –  
	United States of America
	
	
	
	
	
 	1980 
	
	
to United States of America 1919
    
	
		
			Untitled
			
				
		
		
        1966 
	
	
	
	planographic
	 
lithograph 
	 on paper
 
	
19/25
	
	
edition of 25
	
	
	  
	
signed and dated, l.r., pencil, "Philip Guston ‘66"
inscribed, l.l., pencil, "19/25"
			
			53.1 (h)
			 x 71.2 (w)
			
			cm
			
	
	Purchased 1985
	
	
	National Gallery of Australia, Canberra
		
				NGA 1985.1552
		
	
	
	
- with Irwin Hollander, New York;
- from whom bought by the Australian National Gallery, August 1985
- The Spontaneous Gesture
                               - National Gallery of Australia 06 Jun 1987 – 13 Sep 1987
 
- Abstract Expressionism: the National Gallery of Australia celebrates the centenaries of Jackson Pollock and Morris Louis
                               - 14 Jul 2012 – 24 Feb 2013
 
Guston rethought his artistic processes during the 1960s. Doubting his aesthetic course, he stopped painting in 1966 to return to the simplicity of drawing, identifying it as a way to strip back his art to its basic components. At this time he also explored lithography and was drawn to the immediacy of the medium. Printmaking allowed him to experiment freely by combining the spontaneity of drawing while preserving the unpredictability of paint. Guston further simplified his art by omitting colour and reducing his forms to simple outlines.
Guston worked directly onto the lithographic stone, producing a variety of abstract marks and simplified figurative forms. In these two lithographs he adopted different approaches. In the first, he used undiluted ink and compacted the composition, the sharp, opaque lines suggesting a massing of figures in a three-dimensional scene. In contrast, the second work features a loose composition of fluid, semi-transparent marks and a largely flattened picture plane; here the elements of the composition swell and explode across the surface of the work. The techniques adopted by Guston during this period were influential for his later paintings.
Caitlin Eyre
Guston rethought his artistic processes during the 1960s. Doubting his aesthetic course, he stopped painting in 1966 to return to the simplicity of drawing, identifying it as a way to strip back his art to its basic components. At this time he also explored lithography and was drawn to the immediacy of the medium. Printmaking allowed him to experiment freely by combining the spontaneity of drawing while preserving the unpredictability of paint. Guston further simplified his art by omitting colour and reducing his forms to simple outlines.
Guston worked directly onto the lithographic stone, producing a variety of abstract marks and simplified figurative forms. In these two lithographs he adopted different approaches. In the first, he used undiluted ink and compacted the composition, the sharp, opaque lines suggesting a massing of figures in a three-dimensional scene. In contrast, the second work features a loose composition of fluid, semi-transparent marks and a largely flattened picture plane; here the elements of the composition swell and explode across the surface of the work. The techniques adopted by Guston during this period were influential for his later paintings.
Caitlin Eyre
Guston rethought his artistic processes during the 1960s. Doubting his aesthetic course, he stopped painting in 1966 to return to the simplicity of drawing, identifying it as a way to strip back his art to its basic components. At this time he also explored lithography and was drawn to the immediacy of the medium. Printmaking allowed him to experiment freely by combining the spontaneity of drawing while preserving the unpredictability of paint. Guston further simplified his art by omitting colour and reducing his forms to simple outlines.
Guston worked directly onto the lithographic stone, producing a variety of abstract marks and simplified figurative forms. In these two lithographs he adopted different approaches. In the first, he used undiluted ink and compacted the composition, the sharp, opaque lines suggesting a massing of figures in a three-dimensional scene. In contrast, the second work features a loose composition of fluid, semi-transparent marks and a largely flattened picture plane; here the elements of the composition swell and explode across the surface of the work. The techniques adopted by Guston during this period were influential for his later paintings.
Caitlin Eyre
 
	
	
	
	 
