Untitledand Oyster liver are among a number of Kline’s preliminary sketches created during the 1950s. These painted drawings were produced in the hundreds and were kept in the artist’s studio until he selected a drawing to form the basis of one of his paintings. Despite the powerful energy of Kline’s canvases, these draft sketches reveal that the artist’s creative process was not one of spontaneous action, but rather one of careful selection and practised control. Integral to his process was the scaling-up of such drawings, using a freehand technique as well as a Bell-Opticon projector. Furthermore, Untitled is an example of Kline’s preference for working on the torn pages of telephone books: a cheap support on which he could freely and inexpensively plot his compositions.

These drawings provide bookends for Kline’s most celebrated creative period: between 1950 and 1956, during which he worked almost exclusively with a dramatic palette of only black and white. Working at night, under artificial light, this extreme colour reduction allowed him to heighten the psychological charge of his images with an emphasis on form above colour, which, once removed, could not interrupt the dynamic thrusts, angles and action of the loaded brushstroke. By 1956 Kline had begun to re-introduce colour into his compositions and Oyster liver shows this early and gradual addition of tonal variation.

In his analysis of the artist’s black-and-white paintings, David Anfam makes a strong argument that links Kline’s painterly concerns with the sensibilities of the American photographers of the New York School, particularly the work of Robert Frank.[1] Both Kline the painter and Frank the photographer observed New York City through a black-and-white veil—its industrial power and speed, as well as evoking the loneliness of its inhabitants—using severe cropping, an enlargement of detail and deliberate collapsing of spatial depth.

Jaklyn Babington

[1] David Anfam, Franz Kline: Black and white 1950­–1961, Houston: The Menil Collection, 1994, pp. 20­–21